McCain Takes on Obama/Democrats on Mortgage Crisis

palin is being scrutinized for doing her job as governor in Alaska. If anyone other then family had gone to her for help to get that monstor cop who tazered his own stepson and got caught drinking while on duty in his troopers car, then she would be expected to take action. Does this mean that if you are in politics you can't see justice done if it has anything to do with a family member? That you have to turn the other cheek? I say go Palin!

Very interesting thoughts expressed

Bill Cosby on Rev. Wright

Rev. Wright epitomizes the thoughts and actions that
have prevented and continue to prevent black America from moving ahead
and achieving their potential as a people. He suggests that this United
States of America made up of sons and daughters of immigrants (I'm
talking of the millions of 1st, 2nd, 3rd generation immigrants in this
country) of every race, creed, color and religion each and everyone of
them who had nothing to do with slavery, some how owe something to a
group of people who have never been slaves? Its amazing. It seems
everyone is to blame for the shambles black society is in with its
violence, drugs, high school drop out rates, misogyny, and a host of
other real and virulent problems, except for the very people who engage
in such behavior. Enough. As a society, culture or people, they s hould< BR>look within themselves and fix their problems. When did this man become
the spokesman for the 'black church'? And of course his church is
different, but that doesn't mean his message and philosophy is
acceptable, or productive or non-offensive or not-racist or indicative
or our greater cultural behaviors, values and norms Americans. And yes,
the link between this man and Obama really does matter. At a very
minimum, it provides insight into the political and philosophical strain
that Obama adheres to.

Comment by Bill Cosby – April 28, 2008 at 1:57 pm – Link
- The Wall Street Journal
<http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2008/04/28/rev-wr…
liation/#comment-110573>
<http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2008/04/28/rev-wr…
liation/#comment-110573>

The Jihad Candidate
by Rich Carroll
April 7, 2008

Conspiracy theories make for interesting novels when the storyline is not so
absurd that it can grasp our attention. 'The Manchurian Candidate' and 'Seven
Days in May' are examples of plausible chains of events that captures the
reader's imagination at best-seller level. 'What if' has always been the solid
grist of fiction.

Get yourself something cool to drink, find a relaxing position, but before you
continue, visualize the television photos of two jet airliners smashing into the
Twin Towers in lower Manhattan and remind yourself this cowardly act of
Muslim terror was planned for eight years.

How long did it take Islam and their oil money to find a candidate for
President of the United States? As long as it took them to place a Senator
from Illinois and Minnesota? The same amount of time to create a large
Muslim enclave in Detroit? The time it took them to build over 2,000
mosques in America? The same amount of time required to place radical
wahabbist clerics in our military and prisons as 'chaplains'?

Find a candidate who can get away with lying about their father being a
'freedom fighter' when he was actually part of the most corrupt and violent
government in Kenya's history. Find a candidate with close ties to The Nation
of Islam and the violent Muslim overthrow in Africa, a candidate who is
educated among white infidel Americans but hides his bitterness and anger
behind a superficial toothy smile. Find a candidate who changes his American
name of Barry to the Muslim name of Barak Hussein Obama, and dares anyone
to question his true ties under the banner of 'racism'.

Nurture this candidate in an atmosphere of anti-white American teaching and
surround him with Islamic teachers. Provide him with a bitter, racist,
anti-white, anti-American wife, and supply him with Muslim middle east
connections and Islamic monies. Allow him to be clever enough to get away
with his anti-white rhetoric and proclaim he will give $834 billion taxpayer
dollars to the Muslim controlled United Nations for use in Africa.

Install your candidate in an atmosphere of deception because questioning him
on any issue involving Africa or Islam would be seen as 'bigoted racism'; two
words too powerful to allow the citizenry to be informed of facts. Allow your
candidate to employ several black racist Nation of Islam Louis Farrakhan
followers as members of his Illinois Senatorial and campaign staffs.

Where is the bloodhound American 'free press' who doggedly overturned every
stone in the Watergate case? Where are our nation's reporters that have placed
every Presidential candidate under the microscope of detailed scrutiny; the
same press who pursue Bush's 'Skull and Bones' club or ran other candidates
off with persistent detective and research work? Why haven't 'newsmen'
pursued the 65 blatant lies told by this candidate during the Presidential
primaries? Where are the stories about this candidate's cousin and the Muslim
butchery in Africa? Since when did our national press corps become weak,
timid, and silent? Why haven't they regaled us with the long list of socialists
and communists who have surrounded this 'out of nowhere' Democrat
candidate or that his church re-printed the Hamas Manifesto in their bulletin,
and that his 'close pastor friend and mentor' met with Middle East terrorist
Moammar Gaddafi, (Guide of the First of September Great Revolution of the
Socialist People's Libyan Arab Jamahiriya)? Why isn't the American press
telling us this candidate is supported by every Muslim organization in the
world?

As an ultimate slap in the face, be blatant in the fact your candidate has ZERO
interest in traditional American values and has the most liberal voting record
in U.S. Senate history. Why has the American main stream media clammed-up
on any negative reporting on Barak Hussein Obama? Why will they print
Hillary Rodham Clinton's name but never write his middle name? Is it not his
name? Why, suddenly, is ANY information about this candidate not coming
from main stream media, but from the blogosphere by citizens seeking facts
and the truth? Why isn't our media connecting the dots with Islam? Why do
they focus on 'those bad American soldiers' while Islam slaughters non
Muslims daily in 44 countries around the globe? Why does our media refer to
Darfur as 'ethnic cleansing' instead of what it really is; Muslims killing non
Muslims! There is enough strange, anti-American activity surrounding Barak
Hussein Obama to peek the curiosity of any reporter. WHERE IS OUR
INVESTIGATIVE MEDIA!?

A formal plan for targeting America was devised three years after the Iranian
revolution in 1982. The plan was summarized in a 1991 memorandum by
Mohamed Akram, an operative of the global Muslim Brotherhood. 'The process
of settlement' of Muslims in America, Akram explained, 'is a civilization jihad
process.' This means that members of the Brotherhood must understand that
their work in 'America is a kind of grand jihad in eliminating and destroying
the Western civilization from within and sabotaging its miserable house by
their hands and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated and God's
religion is made victorious over all other religions.'

There is terrorism we can see, smell and fear, but there is a new kind of terror
invading The United States in the form of Sharia law and finance. Condoning
it is civilization suicide. Middle East Muslims are coming to America in record
numbers and building hate infidel mosques, buying our corporations, suing us
for our traditions, but they and the whole subject of Islam is white noise
leaving uninformed Americans about who and what is really peaceful. Where is
our investigative press? Any criticism of Islam or their intentions, even
though Islamic leaders state their intentions daily around the globe,
brings-forth a volley of 'racist' from the left-wing Democrat crowd.

Lies and deception behind a master plan – the ingredients for 'The Manchurian
Candidate' or the placement of an anti-American President in our nation's
White House? Is it mere coincidence that an anti-capitalist run for President
at the same time Islamic sharia finance and law is trying to make advancing
strides into the United States? Is it mere coincidence this same candidate
wants to dis-arm our nuclear capability at a time when terrorist Muslim
nations are expanding their nuclear weapons capability? Is it mere
coincidence this candidate wants to reduce our military at a time of global
jihad from Muslim nations?

Change for America? What change? To become another 'nation of Islam'?
________________________________________

Subj: Fw: Fwd: Thomas Sowell Speaks

Very interesting perspective worthy of some serious consideration especially since this is coming from a west coaster and acadimician. . .As Sowell suggests, this election is shaping up to be an “American Idol” or “Dancing with the Stars” contest.
An Old Newness
Thomas Sowell
Rose and Milton Friedman Senior Fellow
The Hoover Institution
Stanford University
Stanford, California 94305

By Thomas Sowell
Tuesday, April 29, 2008

Many years ago, a great hitter named Paul Waner was nearing the end of his long career. He entered a ballgame with 2,999 hits — one hit away from the landmark total of 3,000, which so many hitters want to reach, but which relatively few actually do reach.

Waner hit a ball that the fielder did not handle cleanly but the official scorer called it a hit, making it Waner's 3,000th. Paul Waner then sent word to the official scorer that he did not want that questionable hit to be the one that put him over the top.

The official scorer reversed himself and called it an error. Later Paul Waner got a clean hit for number 3,000.

What reminded me of this is the great fervor that many
seem to feel over the prospect of the first black President of the United States.

No doubt it is only a matter of time before there is a black president, just as it was only a matter of time before Paul Waner got his 3,000th hit. The issue is whether we want to reach that landmark so badly that we are willing to overlook how questionably that landmark is reached.

Paul Waner had too much pride to accept a scratch hit. Choosing a President of the United States is a lot more momentous than a baseball record. We the voters need to have far more concern about who we put in that office that holds the destiny of a nation and of generations yet unborn.

There is no reason why someone as arrogant, foolishly clever and ultimately dangerous as Barack Obama should become president — especially not at a time when the threat of international terrorists with nuclear weapons looms over 300 million Americans.

Many people seem
to regard elections as occasions for venting emotions, like cheering for your favorite team or choosing a Homecoming Queen.

The three leading candidates for their party's nomination are being discussed in terms of their demographics — race, sex and age — as if that is what the job is about.

One of the painful aspects of studying great catastrophes of the past is discovering how many times people were preoccupied with trivialities when they were teetering on the edge of doom. The demographics of the presidency are far less important than the momentous weight of responsibility that office carries.

Just the power to nominate federal judges to trial courts and appellate courts across the country, including the Supreme Court, can have an enormous impact for decades to come. There is no point feeling outraged by things done by federal judges, if you vote on the basis of emotion for those who appoint them.

Barack Obama has already
indicated that he wants judges who make social policy instead of just applying the law. He has already tried to stop young violent criminals from being tried as adults.

Although Senator Obama has presented himself as the candidate of new things — using the mantra of “change” endlessly — the cold fact is that virtually everything he says about domestic policy is straight out of the 1960s and virtually everything he says about foreign policy is straight out of the 1930s.

Protecting criminals, attacking business, increasing government spending, promoting a sense of envy and grievance, raising taxes on people who are productive and subsidizing those who are not — all this is a re-run of the 1960s.

We paid a terrible price for such 1960s notions in the years that followed, in the form of soaring crime rates, double-digit inflation and double-digit unemployment. During the 1960s, ghettoes across the countries were ravaged by riots from
which many have not fully recovered to this day.

The violence and destruction were concentrated not where there was the greatest poverty or injustice but where there were the most liberal politicians, promoting grievances and hamstringing the police.

Internationally, the approach that Senator Obama proposes — including the media magic of meetings between heads of state — was tried during the 1930s. That approach, in the name of peace, is what led to the most catastrophic war in human history.

Everything seems new to those too young to remember the old and too ignorant of history to have heard about it.

Thomas Sowell is a senior fellow at the Hoover Institute and author of Basic Economics: A Citizen's Guide to the Economy.

________________________________________

KEEP AMERICA FREE!!!

Vote for a true American to run the United States of America and what all it stands for!!!

Not someone who has Muslim ties… Who will allow Muslims to overtake our United States of America…

Not for someone who is pro for Partial Birth Abortion… Killing unborn babies…

Not for someone who will run America and all it stands for into the ground…

Not for someone who so many Americans are afraid of… Usually it’s just about who we think would be “better” qualified…

This time there is a great fear out there of Obama and his putting an end to our country and to our very freedom…