Finally McCain is doing what he should have done weeks ago. Here is part of a speech he is supposed to deliver later today.

This crisis started in our housing market in the form of subprime loans that were pushed on people who could not afford them. Bad mortgages were being backed by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, and it was only a matter of time before a contagion of unsustainable debt began to spread. This corruption was encouraged by Democrats in Congress, and abetted by Senator Obama.
Senator Obama has accused me of opposing regulation to avert this crisis. I guess he believes if a lie is big enough and repeated often enough it will be believed. But the truth is I was the one who called at the time for tighter restrictions on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac that could have helped prevent this crisis from happening in the first place.

And the best part.

Rather than answer his critics, Senator Obama will try to distract you from noticing that he never answers the serious and legitimate questions he has been asked. But let me reply in the plainest terms I know. I don’t need lessons about telling the truth to American people. And were I ever to need any improvement in that regard, I probably wouldn’t seek advice from a Chicago politician.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Reddit
  • email
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

9 Responses to “McCain Takes on Obama/Democrats on Mortgage Crisis”

  • GoPalinGo says:

    palin is being scrutinized for doing her job as governor in Alaska. If anyone other then family had gone to her for help to get that monstor cop who tazered his own stepson and got caught drinking while on duty in his troopers car, then she would be expected to take action. Does this mean that if you are in politics you can't see justice done if it has anything to do with a family member? That you have to turn the other cheek? I say go Palin!

  • KeepAmericaFree says:

    Subject: Fw: Anti-Christ???
    A Trivia question:
    How long is the beast allowed to have authority in Revelations?
    Guess the Answer?
    Revelations 13:5 tells us it is 42 months. This is almost a four-year
    term to a Presidency. All I can say is Lord Have Mercy on us!!!!!!

    According to The Book of Revelations the anti-Christ will be a man, in
    his 40s, of MUSLIM descent, who will deceive the nations with
    persuasive language, and have a MASSIVE Christ-like appeal….the prophecy says that people will flock to him and he will promise
    false hope and world peace, and when he is in power, will destroy
    everything .

    Is it OBAMA?? I STRONGLY URGE each one of you to repost this as many
    times as you can! Each opportunity that you have to send it to a
    friend or media outlet…do it! Refuse to take a chance on this
    unknown candidate who came out of nowhere.

  • KeepAmericaFree says:

    Very interesting thoughts expressed

    Bill Cosby on Rev. Wright

    Rev. Wright epitomizes the thoughts and actions that
    have prevented and continue to prevent black America from moving ahead
    and achieving their potential as a people. He suggests that this United
    States of America made up of sons and daughters of immigrants (I'm
    talking of the millions of 1st, 2nd, 3rd generation immigrants in this
    country) of every race, creed, color and religion each and everyone of
    them who had nothing to do with slavery, some how owe something to a
    group of people who have never been slaves? Its amazing. It seems
    everyone is to blame for the shambles black society is in with its
    violence, drugs, high school drop out rates, misogyny, and a host of
    other real and virulent problems, except for the very people who engage
    in such behavior. Enough. As a society, culture or people, they s hould< BR>look within themselves and fix their problems. When did this man become
    the spokesman for the 'black church'? And of course his church is
    different, but that doesn't mean his message and philosophy is
    acceptable, or productive or non-offensive or not-racist or indicative
    or our greater cultural behaviors, values and norms Americans. And yes,
    the link between this man and Obama really does matter. At a very
    minimum, it provides insight into the political and philosophical strain
    that Obama adheres to.

    Comment by Bill Cosby – April 28, 2008 at 1:57 pm – Link
    - The Wall Street Journal
    <http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2008/04/28/rev-wr...
    liation/#comment-110573>
    <http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2008/04/28/rev-wr...
    liation/#comment-110573>

  • KeepAmericaFree says:

    Does anyone have any arguements for any of these statements? Hit me back if you do…

    Read down to the very bottom highlighted in green , IT'LL GIVE YOU GOOSEBUMPS!!!

    1. The Garden of Eden was in Iraq

    2. Mesopotamia, which is now Iraq, was the cradle of civilization!

    3. Noah built the ark in Iraq

    4. The Tower of Babel was in Iraq

    5. Abraham was from Ur, which is in Southern Iraq!

    6. Isaac's wife Rebekah is from Nahor, which is in Iraq!

    7. Jacob met Rachel in Iraq

    8. Jonah preached in Nineveh – which is in Iraq

    9. Assyria, which is in Iraq, conquered the ten tribes of Israel

    10. Amos cried out in Iraq!

    11 Babylon, which is in Iraq, destroyed Jerusalem

    12. Daniel was in the lion's den in Iraq!

    13. The three Hebrew children were in the fire in Iraq (Jesus had been in Iraq also as the fourth person in the Fiery Furnace!)

    14. Belshazzar, the King of Babylon saw the 'writing on the wall' in Iraq

    15. Nebuchadnezzar, King of Babylon, carried the Jews captive into Iraq

    16. Ezekiel preached in Iraq …..

    17. The wise men were from Iraq …

    18. Peter preached in Iraq …

    19.. The 'Empire of Man' described in Revelation is called Babylon, which was a city in Iraq!

    And you have probably seen this one: Israel is the nation most often mentioned in the Bible.

    But do you know which nation is second?

    It is Iraq !

    However, that is not the name that is used in the Bible.

    The names used in the Bible are Babylon , Land of Shinar , and Mesopotamia . The word Mesopotamia means between the two rivers, more exactly between the Tigris and Euphrates Rivers

    The name Iraq , means country with deep roots.

    Indeed Iraq is a country with deep roots and is a very significant country in the Bible.

    No other nation, except Israel , has more history and prophecy associated with it than Iraq

    And also, this is something to think about:
    Since America is typically represented by an eagle…

    Saddam should have read up on his Muslim passages…

    The following verse is from the Koran, (the Islamic Bible):

    Koran ( 9:11 ) – For it is written that a son of Arabia would awaken a fearsome Eagle…the wrath of the Eagle would be felt throughout the lands of Allah and lo, while some of the people trembled in despair still more rejoiced; for the wrath of the Eagle cleansed the lands of Allah;

    And there was peace.

    (Note the verse number!) Hmmmmmmm?!

  • KeepAmericaFree says:

    The Jihad Candidate
    by Rich Carroll
    April 7, 2008

    Conspiracy theories make for interesting novels when the storyline is not so
    absurd that it can grasp our attention. 'The Manchurian Candidate' and 'Seven
    Days in May' are examples of plausible chains of events that captures the
    reader's imagination at best-seller level. 'What if' has always been the solid
    grist of fiction.

    Get yourself something cool to drink, find a relaxing position, but before you
    continue, visualize the television photos of two jet airliners smashing into the
    Twin Towers in lower Manhattan and remind yourself this cowardly act of
    Muslim terror was planned for eight years.

    How long did it take Islam and their oil money to find a candidate for
    President of the United States? As long as it took them to place a Senator
    from Illinois and Minnesota? The same amount of time to create a large
    Muslim enclave in Detroit? The time it took them to build over 2,000
    mosques in America? The same amount of time required to place radical
    wahabbist clerics in our military and prisons as 'chaplains'?

    Find a candidate who can get away with lying about their father being a
    'freedom fighter' when he was actually part of the most corrupt and violent
    government in Kenya's history. Find a candidate with close ties to The Nation
    of Islam and the violent Muslim overthrow in Africa, a candidate who is
    educated among white infidel Americans but hides his bitterness and anger
    behind a superficial toothy smile. Find a candidate who changes his American
    name of Barry to the Muslim name of Barak Hussein Obama, and dares anyone
    to question his true ties under the banner of 'racism'.

    Nurture this candidate in an atmosphere of anti-white American teaching and
    surround him with Islamic teachers. Provide him with a bitter, racist,
    anti-white, anti-American wife, and supply him with Muslim middle east
    connections and Islamic monies. Allow him to be clever enough to get away
    with his anti-white rhetoric and proclaim he will give $834 billion taxpayer
    dollars to the Muslim controlled United Nations for use in Africa.

    Install your candidate in an atmosphere of deception because questioning him
    on any issue involving Africa or Islam would be seen as 'bigoted racism'; two
    words too powerful to allow the citizenry to be informed of facts. Allow your
    candidate to employ several black racist Nation of Islam Louis Farrakhan
    followers as members of his Illinois Senatorial and campaign staffs.

    Where is the bloodhound American 'free press' who doggedly overturned every
    stone in the Watergate case? Where are our nation's reporters that have placed
    every Presidential candidate under the microscope of detailed scrutiny; the
    same press who pursue Bush's 'Skull and Bones' club or ran other candidates
    off with persistent detective and research work? Why haven't 'newsmen'
    pursued the 65 blatant lies told by this candidate during the Presidential
    primaries? Where are the stories about this candidate's cousin and the Muslim
    butchery in Africa? Since when did our national press corps become weak,
    timid, and silent? Why haven't they regaled us with the long list of socialists
    and communists who have surrounded this 'out of nowhere' Democrat
    candidate or that his church re-printed the Hamas Manifesto in their bulletin,
    and that his 'close pastor friend and mentor' met with Middle East terrorist
    Moammar Gaddafi, (Guide of the First of September Great Revolution of the
    Socialist People's Libyan Arab Jamahiriya)? Why isn't the American press
    telling us this candidate is supported by every Muslim organization in the
    world?

    As an ultimate slap in the face, be blatant in the fact your candidate has ZERO
    interest in traditional American values and has the most liberal voting record
    in U.S. Senate history. Why has the American main stream media clammed-up
    on any negative reporting on Barak Hussein Obama? Why will they print
    Hillary Rodham Clinton's name but never write his middle name? Is it not his
    name? Why, suddenly, is ANY information about this candidate not coming
    from main stream media, but from the blogosphere by citizens seeking facts
    and the truth? Why isn't our media connecting the dots with Islam? Why do
    they focus on 'those bad American soldiers' while Islam slaughters non
    Muslims daily in 44 countries around the globe? Why does our media refer to
    Darfur as 'ethnic cleansing' instead of what it really is; Muslims killing non
    Muslims! There is enough strange, anti-American activity surrounding Barak
    Hussein Obama to peek the curiosity of any reporter. WHERE IS OUR
    INVESTIGATIVE MEDIA!?

    A formal plan for targeting America was devised three years after the Iranian
    revolution in 1982. The plan was summarized in a 1991 memorandum by
    Mohamed Akram, an operative of the global Muslim Brotherhood. 'The process
    of settlement' of Muslims in America, Akram explained, 'is a civilization jihad
    process.' This means that members of the Brotherhood must understand that
    their work in 'America is a kind of grand jihad in eliminating and destroying
    the Western civilization from within and sabotaging its miserable house by
    their hands and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated and God's
    religion is made victorious over all other religions.'

    There is terrorism we can see, smell and fear, but there is a new kind of terror
    invading The United States in the form of Sharia law and finance. Condoning
    it is civilization suicide. Middle East Muslims are coming to America in record
    numbers and building hate infidel mosques, buying our corporations, suing us
    for our traditions, but they and the whole subject of Islam is white noise
    leaving uninformed Americans about who and what is really peaceful. Where is
    our investigative press? Any criticism of Islam or their intentions, even
    though Islamic leaders state their intentions daily around the globe,
    brings-forth a volley of 'racist' from the left-wing Democrat crowd.

    Lies and deception behind a master plan – the ingredients for 'The Manchurian
    Candidate' or the placement of an anti-American President in our nation's
    White House? Is it mere coincidence that an anti-capitalist run for President
    at the same time Islamic sharia finance and law is trying to make advancing
    strides into the United States? Is it mere coincidence this same candidate
    wants to dis-arm our nuclear capability at a time when terrorist Muslim
    nations are expanding their nuclear weapons capability? Is it mere
    coincidence this candidate wants to reduce our military at a time of global
    jihad from Muslim nations?

    Change for America? What change? To become another 'nation of Islam'?
    ________________________________________

  • KeepAmericaFree says:

    ________________________________________

    So you love your slinky OBAMA ??? Then, read, in his OWN words, just which way his intentions and beliefs lead him !!!!
    (Read his last statement)

    This guy wants to be our President and control our government. Pay close attention to the last comment!! Below are a few lines from Obama's books ” his words:

    From Dreams of My Father: “I ceased to advertise my mother's race at the age of 12 or 13, when I began to suspect that by doing so I was ingratiating myself to whites.”

    From Dreams of My Father: “I found a solace in nursing a pervasive sense of grievance and animosity against my mother's race.”</ SPAN>

    From Dreams of My Father: “There was something about him that made me wary, a little too sure of himself, maybe. And white.”

    From Dreams of My Father: ; “It remained necessary to prove which side you were on, to show your loyalty to the black masses, to strike out and name names.”

    From Dreams of My Father: “I never emulate white men and brown men whose fates didn't speak to my own. It was into my father's image, the black man, son of Africa , that I'd packed all the a ttributes I sought in myself, the attributes of Martin and Malcolm, Dubois and Mandela.”

    From Audacity of Hope: “I will stand with the Muslims should the political winds shift in an ugly direction.”
    READ THAT LAST SENTENCE OVER AND OVER UNTIL IT SINKS IN !!!! ALL MUSLIMS HAVE VOWED TO KILL EVERY INFIDEL (NON-BELIEVER) – - – THAT'S YOU, !!!!!

  • KeepAmericaFree says:

    Subj: Fw: Fwd: Thomas Sowell Speaks

    Very interesting perspective worthy of some serious consideration especially since this is coming from a west coaster and acadimician. . .As Sowell suggests, this election is shaping up to be an “American Idol” or “Dancing with the Stars” contest.
    An Old Newness
    Thomas Sowell
    Rose and Milton Friedman Senior Fellow
    The Hoover Institution
    Stanford University
    Stanford, California 94305

    By Thomas Sowell
    Tuesday, April 29, 2008

    Many years ago, a great hitter named Paul Waner was nearing the end of his long career. He entered a ballgame with 2,999 hits — one hit away from the landmark total of 3,000, which so many hitters want to reach, but which relatively few actually do reach.

    Waner hit a ball that the fielder did not handle cleanly but the official scorer called it a hit, making it Waner's 3,000th. Paul Waner then sent word to the official scorer that he did not want that questionable hit to be the one that put him over the top.

    The official scorer reversed himself and called it an error. Later Paul Waner got a clean hit for number 3,000.

    What reminded me of this is the great fervor that many
    seem to feel over the prospect of the first black President of the United States.

    No doubt it is only a matter of time before there is a black president, just as it was only a matter of time before Paul Waner got his 3,000th hit. The issue is whether we want to reach that landmark so badly that we are willing to overlook how questionably that landmark is reached.

    Paul Waner had too much pride to accept a scratch hit. Choosing a President of the United States is a lot more momentous than a baseball record. We the voters need to have far more concern about who we put in that office that holds the destiny of a nation and of generations yet unborn.

    There is no reason why someone as arrogant, foolishly clever and ultimately dangerous as Barack Obama should become president — especially not at a time when the threat of international terrorists with nuclear weapons looms over 300 million Americans.

    Many people seem
    to regard elections as occasions for venting emotions, like cheering for your favorite team or choosing a Homecoming Queen.

    The three leading candidates for their party's nomination are being discussed in terms of their demographics — race, sex and age — as if that is what the job is about.

    One of the painful aspects of studying great catastrophes of the past is discovering how many times people were preoccupied with trivialities when they were teetering on the edge of doom. The demographics of the presidency are far less important than the momentous weight of responsibility that office carries.

    Just the power to nominate federal judges to trial courts and appellate courts across the country, including the Supreme Court, can have an enormous impact for decades to come. There is no point feeling outraged by things done by federal judges, if you vote on the basis of emotion for those who appoint them.

    Barack Obama has already
    indicated that he wants judges who make social policy instead of just applying the law. He has already tried to stop young violent criminals from being tried as adults.

    Although Senator Obama has presented himself as the candidate of new things — using the mantra of “change” endlessly — the cold fact is that virtually everything he says about domestic policy is straight out of the 1960s and virtually everything he says about foreign policy is straight out of the 1930s.

    Protecting criminals, attacking business, increasing government spending, promoting a sense of envy and grievance, raising taxes on people who are productive and subsidizing those who are not — all this is a re-run of the 1960s.

    We paid a terrible price for such 1960s notions in the years that followed, in the form of soaring crime rates, double-digit inflation and double-digit unemployment. During the 1960s, ghettoes across the countries were ravaged by riots from
    which many have not fully recovered to this day.

    The violence and destruction were concentrated not where there was the greatest poverty or injustice but where there were the most liberal politicians, promoting grievances and hamstringing the police.

    Internationally, the approach that Senator Obama proposes — including the media magic of meetings between heads of state — was tried during the 1930s. That approach, in the name of peace, is what led to the most catastrophic war in human history.

    Everything seems new to those too young to remember the old and too ignorant of history to have heard about it.

    Thomas Sowell is a senior fellow at the Hoover Institute and author of Basic Economics: A Citizen's Guide to the Economy.

    ________________________________________

  • KeepAmericaFree says:

    i beleive she has what it takes from deep within to go all out for this country. Not just hand it over to another country like the one she's running against…

  • KeepAmericaFree says:

    KEEP AMERICA FREE!!!

    Vote for a true American to run the United States of America and what all it stands for!!!

    Not someone who has Muslim ties… Who will allow Muslims to overtake our United States of America…

    Not for someone who is pro for Partial Birth Abortion… Killing unborn babies…

    Not for someone who will run America and all it stands for into the ground…

    Not for someone who so many Americans are afraid of… Usually it’s just about who we think would be “better” qualified…

    This time there is a great fear out there of Obama and his putting an end to our country and to our very freedom…

Leave a Reply

Support Us
Help support the cost of maintaining the site by donating with the link below
Search