Liberals are running crazy today posting an article written by Warren Buffett claiming he’s been “coddled” by the government in regards to taxes.  Someone apparently made him king of rich people as he is now saying the “rich” must be taxed more.  He doesn’t offer any explanation of how that would help anyone, or how it would generate any job growth.

We have written before how liberals can donate as much money as they want to the federal treasury to help pay down the debt.

Now if you look at this chart from the treasury department you will see that in 2011 so far, that people have donated just over $2 million to the government.  Has Buffett or any other of his “friends” donated?  I doubt it.  If people like Warren Buffett think giving more money to a corrupt government helps, then by all means use the link above and donate the billions you say you have.

Please let us know here how much you gave to the government!

Read more at: Americans Against Obama

Thanks to Michelle Malkin for posting this gem. This is one “uninformed” person trying to disrupt a Tea Party rally, but this is a good example of how liberals/progressives (whatever they call themselves now) ignorant they are to facts and reality.

[ad] Empty ad slot (#1)!

Read more at: Americans Against Obama

We have mentioned this before, and once again this administration is looking for new ways to tax the American people to pay for their socialist spending. 

“Acknowledging it would be a highly unpopular move, White House economic adviser Paul Volcker said yesterday the United States should consider imposing a "value added tax" similar to those charged in Europe to help get the deficit under control.

A VAT is a national sales tax that, like state and city sales taxes, would be collected by retailers.”

Link

This is just another step towards the socialist state they want where everyone will have to be dependent on government.

Read more at: Americans Against Obama

Great article from Michelle Malkin on Obama’s proposed “stimulus” plan.

“Barack Obama has dubbed his behemoth fiscal stimulus proposal the “American Economic Recovery and Reinvestment Act.” But if truth in advertising were required of White House plans, only one title would fit the trillion-dollar-plus-and-growing bill: The Generational Theft Act of 2009.

President-elect Obama was at his most candid when he told the country Tuesday that we face massive deficits for the foreseeable future. “Potentially we’ve got trillion-dollar deficits for years to come,” he said, “even with the economic recovery that we are working on.” But one word is glaringly out of place in that warning. It’s the word “even.” Washington will saddle future generations with unprecedented debt because of the economic recovery interventions Obama is planning, not despite them.”

Read the entire article here.

http://michellemalkin.com/2009/01/07/the-generational-theft-act-of-2009/

[ad] Empty ad slot (#1)!

Read more at: Americans Against Obama

This is a great article that every voter should read.

“Let’s talk about Joe the CEO. Obama doesn’t know as much about him as he thinks he does. First, it’s been estimated that there are five million Americans with the title of CEO. As it happens, I’m one of them. My business has experienced many twists and turns and dips and dives over the course of nine years, and I am very far from rich. But during those years I’ve paid out a lot in payroll, in taxes, in equipment rentals, in office rent – did I mention taxes? – and in health insurance premiums for employees as well as myself.”

Read full article.

Read more at: Americans Against Obama

This is coming from one of the people responsible for the housing meltdown.

Read more at: Americans Against Obama

By Philip Klein

“Plouffe was repeating one of the boldest claims made by the Obama campaign. It’s a claim that the Wall Street Journal editorial board dubbed "Obama’s 95% Illusion," noting that more than a third of Americans don’t pay any income taxes, and that what Obama’s plan does do is offer a raft of subsidies and government payments to individuals and families that he redefines as "tax cuts." His proposal looks more like a redistribution scheme than an honest effort to reduce taxes — as he revealed on Monday when he told a now famous Ohio plumber that his plan aimed to "spread the wealth around."

So when Plouffe reiterated the 95 percent claim, I asked him a simple question aimed at clarifying whether Obama’s tax plan was about cutting rates, or merely handing out government checks. "What rates would actually go down"? I asked.

"Middle class people are going to see, systemically, their taxes reduced, and small businesses," Plouffe responded.

"But what rate would go down for lower-income Americans?" I persisted, seeking more information.

"We’ll have to get you the exact details on that," Obama’s campaign manager told me.”

Link: Full Article

[ad] Empty ad slot (#1)!

Read more at: Americans Against Obama

Read more at: Americans Against Obama

Unbelievable.  This man actually wants to tax small businesses.

Read more at: Americans Against Obama

The WSJ has a great piece on Obama’s nonsense that 95% of Americans will receive a tax cut.

“One of Barack Obama’s most potent campaign claims is that he’ll cut taxes for no less than 95% of "working families." He’s even promising to cut taxes enough that the government’s tax share of GDP will be no more than 18.2% — which is lower than it is today.

It’s a clever pitch, because it lets him pose as a middle-class tax cutter while disguising that he’s also proposing one of the largest tax increases ever on the other 5%. But how does he conjure this miracle, especially since more than a third of all Americans already pay no income taxes at all? There are several sleights of hand, but the most creative is to redefine the meaning of "tax cut."

Read the full article.

[ad] Empty ad slot (#1)!

Read more at: Americans Against Obama