Archive for the ‘Republican’ Category

With Obama failing and the nation getting deeper into debt and unemployment, the left is desperate when it comes to smearing Sarah Palin in attempts to take focus off their “leaders” dropping poll numbers.  The latest whining from the left is about her appearance at the Tea Party convention where she made her speech.  Moonbats at the Huffington Post and Dailykooks posted an image of Sarah Palins hand with some writing on it.  The writing simply lists some points to make in a speech, but to me it looks as though the image was Photoshopped as other images throughout the event show nothing written on her hand.  This would be nothing new to these left-wing moonbats as they like to Photoshop images and pass them as real.

The DNC spokesperson comes and compares this to Obama’s heavy use of the teleprompter, even when in front of 6th graders! 

Read the rest of this entry »

Let me first start off by saying I do like Sarah Palin. This is not a shot against her, but the fate of our country is at stake in 2012 and I’m going to speak my mind regardless if the so-called conservatives like it or not.

Palin has a great future ahead of her, but it’s not in running for President of the United States. That is something republicans and conservatives need to start realizing, and realizing now. It’s not that she couldn’t do the job and do it well, it’s that she doesn’t have much of a chance to actually “win” the election. Obama has to be defeated, and we can’t chance it with Palin.

Why?

1. The GOP needs a fresh face. Palin is old news. She was the VP pick and lost, time to move on to better things. Stop looking back, and start looking forward.

2. She made a mistake resigning as Governor. I have watched the interviews, and have come to the conclusion even she can’t honestly say why she resigned. However, it’s clear she did it to write and sell some books. I can’t blame her either. In a couple of years she most likely won’t be making headlines. Now is the time to take advantage of the popularity, but lets just be honest about it.
3. 2012 is going to be a nasty fight, I think we can all agree on that. Palin has had a hard time dealing with the media attacks, and those will be nothing compared to what the left will pull out in ’12. Once again, we can’t take a chance based on past performance.

I have my thoughts known on Twitter about this subject, and the Palin supporters have come out in force. First claiming that it’s because she is a woman. That is funny considering the tactic of the left is to claim racism at every turn. Now I have to deal with this? This leads into another point, which is a portion of conservatives have too much of an emotional attachment to Palin. I can certainly she why, she is a beautiful, charismatic woman.

However, emotional attachments to candidates are a trait of liberalism. It clouds judgement, and that has been proven over and over with these comments towards me from conservatives.

I would personally like to see Palin take over the RNC. She would do a fantastic job at running out the RINO’s currently running it, but she needs to skip the Presidential bid. We have to take back our country, and we need someone even stronger than Palin to do it.

[ad#banner-ad]

Obama and Cheney both had speeches about National Security yesterday, and Cheney just smacked Obama down at every turn.

Obama’s speech was the usual….blame Bush, terrorists are victims, and blame Bush some more.

I enjoy using Facebook, as it is a great way to keep up with friends and things of that sort.  However, Facebook has the usual bias against republicans that is common among the “big media” types in the internet today. 

I noticed in the past couple of weeks that some have been joining a “fan page” titled Not having George Bush has President.

And of course we have another page called Telling Dick Cheney to shut the hell up.

If people want to have and create these pages, I really don’t see a reason why not.  Obviously, everyone is entitled to their opinion.  Well except for people wishing the same for Obama.

I tried to create a page with the exact same title as the above, just replacing the name with Obama’s.  This is what I got:

Let me try a page called Impeaching Obama.

Same thing.  It appears having a page which is based on being against Bush or Cheney is allowed, but yet, when trying to create the same pages in regards to Obama, they are flagged.  Why is one wrong and other isn’t?  That is the typical liberal hypocrisy we see today.

[ad#banner-ad]

We have another RINO wanting to head to Washington, and that is Florida governor Charlie Crist. Crist is a so-called “moderate”, which in reality is another term for liberal. These are the people we need to get rid of, not vote for in upcoming elections.

Crist is a supporter of Obama’s stimulus plan, and likes to make public appearances with him throughout the state. Do not support him. Marco Rubio is also running, and deserves your support.

Oh wait…..

Did you notice that before the election how many liberals were going on their rants about how they were going to move to Canada or Cuba if McCain wins?

Now can you tell me how many conservatives are going around saying they will leave the country? See the difference? Conservatives will stay and fight, liberals want to run away and complain.

[ad#banner-ad]

Today is a monumental day in America’s history. We are on the verge of electing a proud Marxist over an American hero because of a cult-like marketing campaign. Don’t let this happen America. Our prosperity and freedom depends on it.

Mr. Obama has run a brilliant marketing campaign, but in the end he is of little substance. Over the course of this campaign we have discovered the troubling, and still partly unknown past of Obama. He has spent over 20 years surrounding himself with anti-American groups and individuals like Rev. Wright, William Ayers, Khalidi, and many more. In his own words he had sought out Marxist professors in college, and maintained these types of associations up until today.

There are still large gaps in Obama’s history that he won’t acknowledge, that we still don’t know about, and that the media has never questioned him on. Throughout this campaign, the U.S. media has done nothing but openly support Obama, and even going as far as covering up his dubious associations and real voting record.

America is in a rough time as far as the economy, and Mr. Obama still proposes to raise taxes in this struggling economy. He tries to convince his supporters that this is a good idea because it will affect the “rich” more than anyone, but his supporters fail to understand the people he wants to tax are your employers, small businesses, and hard working Americans. Obama states he wants to cut taxes for 90% of Americans, but also fails to tell you that 90% of Americans don’t pay taxes.

He has also openly supported “spreading the wealth”, which means he will take your hard earned money and distribute it to people who didn’t earn it. Are you seriously comfortable with that? This will be the greatest expansion of the welfare state in America’s history, and will turn the already troubled economy into a much worse state.

Looking back at Obama’s voting record throughout his limited political career, we also see another troubling trend. He has consistently voted against gun rights, even supporting bills that would criminalize people using weapons to defend their own households. He is voted one of the worst politicians for gun owners, and that is reason alone not to vote for him.

We have already seen what an Obama Presidency will be like. Anyone who opposes him have been labeled as racists, he has tried to organize state prosecutors to intimidate opponents, he has shunned reporter who dared endorse McCain, we have seen militant youth brainwashed by Obama supporters, the list goes on and on, and it is very scary indeed.

So think about all this before voting. Do you really want the U.S. to become more of a nanny state than it already is? Make the right choice America, and it’s not Obama.

“Media coverage of John McCain has been heavily unfavorable since the political conventions, more than three times as negative as the portrayal of Barack Obama, a new study says.
Fifty-seven percent of the print and broadcast stories about the Republican nominee were decidedly negative, the Project for Excellence in Journalism says in a report out today, while 14 percent were positive. The McCain campaign has repeatedly complained that the mainstream media are biased toward the senator from Illinois.
Obama’s coverage was more balanced during the six-week period from Sept. 8 through last Thursday, with 36 percent of the stories clearly positive, 35 percent neutral or mixed and 29 percent negative. “

Study: Coverage of McCain Much More Negative Than That of Obama | The Trail | washingtonpost.com

Finally McCain is doing what he should have done weeks ago. Here is part of a speech he is supposed to deliver later today.

This crisis started in our housing market in the form of subprime loans that were pushed on people who could not afford them. Bad mortgages were being backed by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, and it was only a matter of time before a contagion of unsustainable debt began to spread. This corruption was encouraged by Democrats in Congress, and abetted by Senator Obama.
Senator Obama has accused me of opposing regulation to avert this crisis. I guess he believes if a lie is big enough and repeated often enough it will be believed. But the truth is I was the one who called at the time for tighter restrictions on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac that could have helped prevent this crisis from happening in the first place.

And the best part.

Rather than answer his critics, Senator Obama will try to distract you from noticing that he never answers the serious and legitimate questions he has been asked. But let me reply in the plainest terms I know. I don’t need lessons about telling the truth to American people. And were I ever to need any improvement in that regard, I probably wouldn’t seek advice from a Chicago politician.

[ad#banner-ad]